|
Rarely do I address anything - sports or
otherwise - in the context of morality.
For instance, you could say there are two
types of men in this country: those who
"happened to tune into this past weekend's
Women's Final at Wimbledon because an exciting
young dark horse was looking to upset Serena
Williams," and those who wanted to spend
three-plus hours ogling the hottest pair of legs
this side of Moscow.
Both groups watched for the same reason,
but only one admitted to it. I know I didn't
suddenly take interest in anything tennis
related outside of how Maria Sharapova shook her
moneymaker in a skirt, and the fact I'm willing
to hone up to such transgressions means I'm
probably not a man suited to address morality.
But on Tuesday afternoon, there it was: a
countdown ticker running below the 6 p.m. EST
edition of SportsCenter heralding the remaining
minutes and seconds until the premiere of the
2004 World Series of Poker. Here was the
network's flagship program in its highest-rated
timeslot having its thunder usurped by a ticker
for...card games. The Lakers' coaching
situation, Shaq in free agency, the Marcus Vick
arrest, all of it seemed second place to
old-West style block lettering declaring "ONLY
2:54:09 UNTIL TEXAS HOLDEM POKER."
Such a gaudy advertising device is
normally reserved for major events - like actual
sports - but don't tell ESPN that. While
watching someone play cards on TV might not
sound appealing, it apparently is. Poker,
specifically a collection of the world's best
Texas Holdem players convening
in Las Vegas to battle in No Limit Texas Hold 'Em
(if you don't know, ask a frat guy), has become
the new American past time in cable television.
After the network aired 12 hours of coverage
from the 2003 World Series, ESPN saw a ratings
spike unlike anything outside of their major
sports coverage, and in turn re-aired the
installments almost weekly.
The resulting effect was one of cult
celebrity for the game and its players, but the
show's success is only a barometer of gambling's
newfound hold on pop culture. Everywhere you
look, No-Limit Poker is in the mainstream. Actor
Ben Affleck won the California State
Championship. How-To guides for No Limit and
other forms of poker are flying off the shelves.
The Bravo network, normally known for its very
non-heterosexual male programming, launched
"Celebrity Poker Tour," wherein B-rate sitcom
stars gamble for charity. Even the par-quality
poker film "Rounders" is seeing a first rate
re-release on DVD to try and capitalize on the
fad. Even the Travel Channel has poker
programming.
And then there's the collegiate scene,
which has seen the lazy Sunday night poker game
raise its participation, interest, and, most
alarmingly, its stakes. College students,
specifically upper class white males (Ole Miss
has a few of those) are dropping larger and
larger amounts of money on the tables these
days. Add into the mix casinos within a two-hour
drive, and problems mount. Don't tell these
would-be card sharks that. They're on a mission
to be the next great Texas Holdem poker legend.
Therein lies the allure and the problem.
In poker, the American spectator has suddenly
found a sport that defies all physical
capability because there is none at all. Chris
Moneymaker (the 2003 champ) makes Davis Love
look like Javon Kearse. The best poker players
in the world are the ones who are calculating,
cunning and perceptive, not fleet of foot.
American viewers, especially affluent
young men, think, "Hey, I can do that," and take
to the
Texas Holdem tables. Isn't that
a contradiction of what we hold sports to be? I
cover football with respect and awe because I'm
aware that even on the collegiate, hell, high
school level, I can't even complete a screen
pass.
We watch Michael Vick and Barry Bonds do
what's considered nearly impossible: physical
feats of grace and power on level playing fields
where (ideally) the goal is to win for the
purpose of being the greatest at a game, thus
inspiring others. Dress it up however you'd
like, but poker is a game played for money.
Glory, fame and distinguished talent are minor
byproducts. Ultimately, the only thing we're
watching in a poker game is the money move
around.
I'll digress only to ward off rebuttals
that major sports are also soaked in money.
That's understandable, but at least in the NFL
there's an actual sporting event involved. Sure,
every sport has its moral bankruptcy these days.
In the past 10 days a Tennessee tight end
assaulted a professor in the student union,
three FIU players were arrested for armed
robbery and Michael Vick's little brother (once
Virginia Tech's projected starting QB) is facing
his third misdemeanor of the off-season. And
that's just college football. Ask me to rattle
off NBA transgressions, and I'll get carpal
tunnel.
Despite the sins in and around sports we
revere, is that enough for us to raise up a game
that's designed to deceive for financial gains?
Talk about not producing a Dale Murphy or Larry
Bird for kids to look up to; something says
poker will never put a star on a box of Wheaties.
Maybe a box of Marlboros.
But these are just issues of morality, and
I'll draw the conversation short. I have to
finish downloading the remaining women's tennis
schedule for the year. See ya at the Acura
Classic in two weeks.
|