Texas Holdem Poker
Friday, March 05, 2004
  Poker Article

HUTCHISON OMAHA POINT SYSTEM
The purpose of this system is to provide a simple means of evaluating starting hands in Omaha poker. It was developed in several steps:

First, Mike Caro's Poker Probe software was used to determine the win percentage for various four card combinations when played against nine opponents. This was accomplished via a Monte-Carlo type simulation with a minimum of 25,000 hands being dealt for each starting hand. The assumption made in this type of simulation is that each hand is played to the finish. This is, of course, an unreasonable assumption, but , in the absence of detailed knowledge of each player's starting requirements, method of play, etc., it is the best means of approximating a hand's strength and earning potential.

Secondly, a number of components were examined in an effort to determine their relative contribution to the value of each starting hand. Eventually, it was decided that the primary determinants of good Omaha starting hands related to the rank of the cards and whether or not they were paired, suited, or connected.

Finally, a type of regression analysis was conducted to try and determine the relative weighting of each of these factors. The system that follows is the result of quantifying the contribution made by each of these various components.

Once the calculations are made, the resultant point total is an approximation of the actual win percentage for a particular hand--when played to the finish against nine opponents. The correlation between point totals and win percentages, while not representing a one-to-one correspondence is, nevertheless, quite high. In fact, in about 70% of the cases the actual win percentage will be within just one point of the total points awarded by this system. This means that if the system indicates that a given hand earns, say, 20 points, you can be quite confident that the actual win percentage for this hand is between 19 and 21 points. It is very likely to win more often than a hand with 19 points and almost certain to outperform a hand with 18 points.

STEPS IN CALCULATING POINT TOTALS

FIRST, to evaluate the contribution made by suited cards, look to see if your hand contains two or more cards of the same suit. If it does, award points based upon the rank of the highest card. Repeat the procedure if your hand is double suited.

If the highest card is an ACE award 4 points
If the highest card is a KING award 3 points
If the highest card is a QUEEN award 2.5 points
If the highest card is a JACK award 2 points
If the highest card is a TEN or NINE award 1.5 points For any other combination of two suited cards award 1 point.

If your hand contains four cards of the same suit, deduct 2 points.

SECOND, to factor in the advantage of having pairs,

If you have a pair of ACES award 9 points
If you have a pair of KINGS award 8 points
If you have a pair of QUEENS award 7 points
If you have a pair of JACKS or TENS award 6 points
If you have a pair of NINES award 5 points
If you have any other pair award 4 points

Award no points to any hand that contains three of the same rank.

THIRD, when your hand contains cards capable of completing a straight (that is, when the cards do not have more than three gaps), award points as follows:

An ACE with a King, Queen, Jack, or Ten earns 2 points
An ACE with a Two, Three, Four, or Five earns 1 point

Any two cards from TWO through SIX receive 2 points Any two cards from SIX through KING receive 4 points

Any three cards SIX and above earn 7 points

Any four cards SIX and above earn 12 points

From the above totals, deduct 1 point if a one or two card gap occurs and deduct 2 points if a three card gap exists.

FINALLY, a determination must be made as to which hands qualify as playable. This becomes a function of how many points one decides are necessary before entering a hand. My suggestion would be to only play hands that earn 15 points or more. It can be argued that, ignoring the rake, any hand with more than a 10 percent win rate is potentially profitable in the long run. Still, I have the prejudice that most players, and especially those who are relatively inexperienced, would be better advised to forsake marginal hands and to focus on those that earn 15 points or more. Recalling that a random hand will win about 10% of the time in a ten-handed game, it can be seen that playing only premium combinations of 15 points or more, insures that you will always have a hand that is 50% better than a random hand. The point total required to raise or to call someone else's raise must also be determined subjectively. I feel that 20 points is the appropriate level, but, obviously, others may render a different judgment. So, in summary, a safe generalization is

YOU SHOULD CALL WITH 15 POINTS OR MORE AND CONSIDER RAISING WITH 20 POINTS OR MORE

SOME EXAMPLES FOR CLARIFICATION

The hand that has the highest win percentage in Omaha contains two ACES and two KINGS and is double suited. A hand containing the AS, KS, AH, and KH would earn 27 points under this system--calculated as follows: under step one above, the two double suits headed by the two aces earn 4 points each for a total of 8 points; step two awards nine points for the pair of aces and 8 points for the pair of kings, or a total of 17 more points; under step three, the ace-king combination earns 2 points for its straight potential. The resultant total of 27 points closely parallels the actual win percentage for the hand which is about 26.65.

Assume you have the 9S, 8S, 9D, and 8D. Step one awards a total of 3 points for the two double suits headed by nines. Under step two, the pair of nines earns 5 points and the pair of eights earns 4 points. The last step awards 4 points for the 9-8 combination. The total of 16 points is the same as this hand's actual win rate.

With the QS, QD,8H, and 8C, no points are earned under step one as there are no suited cards. Step two gives 7 points for the pair of queens and 4 points for the pair of eights. Step three awards four points for the Q-8 combination but then calls for a deduction of 2 points because of the three card gap that exists between the two cards. The final total is 13 points and this is, again, the actual win percentage for this hand.

A hand consisting of two aces, a deuce, and a seven--all of different suits--earns 9 points for the pair of aces, and 1 point under step three for the ace-two combination. This total of 10 points indicates that this hand has no better prospects than any other random hand. In fact, the actual win percentage obtained through simulation analysis is 10.6.

Consider a hand consisting of the KS, KD, 3S, and 6D. Step one awards a total of 6 points for the two double suits headed by kings. Step two gives 8 points for the pair of kings. The 6-3 combo gets a point under step three, making a total of 15 points.

An example of a hand that tends to be somewhat overrated by novice players is AS, KD, QH, and TS. Under step one the hand receives 4 points for the suited ace and ten. Step two is disregarded as the hand does not contain any pairs. Step three awards 12 points for the straight potential of the four connected cards, before deducting 1 point for the one card gap that exists. The final total is only 15 points, making this a marginally playable hand.

NOTES

To state the obvious: many skills other than initial card selection are essential to maximizing your profits when playing Omaha. Unfortunately, these other skills do not lend themselves to easy quantification, and are thus beyond the scope of this simple mathematical approach. I do hope, though, that this system will be of help to the novice player in making the important decision about which starting hands are worthwhile.


 

Play poker games and tournaments online, including texas hold'em, omaha high, omaha 8 or better and seven card stud.

Paradise Poker has poker action online for real money or for free, 24 hours a day. Play Online at Poker Stars

Site Feed

Add to My Yahoo!

ARCHIVES
Thursday, January 29, 2004 / Friday, January 30, 2004 / Sunday, February 01, 2004 / Wednesday, February 04, 2004 / Sunday, February 15, 2004 / Tuesday, February 17, 2004 / Monday, February 23, 2004 / Tuesday, February 24, 2004 / Wednesday, February 25, 2004 / Saturday, February 28, 2004 / Sunday, February 29, 2004 / Monday, March 01, 2004 / Tuesday, March 02, 2004 / Wednesday, March 03, 2004 / Thursday, March 04, 2004 / Friday, March 05, 2004 / Saturday, March 06, 2004 / Sunday, March 07, 2004 / Tuesday, March 09, 2004 / Wednesday, March 10, 2004 / Thursday, March 11, 2004 / Friday, March 12, 2004 / Saturday, March 13, 2004 / Sunday, March 14, 2004 / Monday, March 15, 2004 / Tuesday, March 16, 2004 / Thursday, March 18, 2004 / Saturday, March 20, 2004 / Sunday, March 21, 2004 / Monday, March 22, 2004 / Wednesday, March 24, 2004 / Thursday, March 25, 2004 / Friday, March 26, 2004 / Saturday, March 27, 2004 / Sunday, March 28, 2004 / Monday, March 29, 2004 / Tuesday, March 30, 2004 / Wednesday, March 31, 2004 / Saturday, April 03, 2004 / Sunday, April 04, 2004 / Monday, April 05, 2004 / Tuesday, April 06, 2004 / Wednesday, April 07, 2004 / Friday, April 09, 2004 / Sunday, April 11, 2004 / Monday, April 12, 2004 / Tuesday, April 13, 2004 / Wednesday, April 14, 2004 / Thursday, April 15, 2004 / Saturday, April 17, 2004 / Sunday, April 18, 2004 / Monday, April 19, 2004 / Tuesday, April 20, 2004 / Wednesday, April 21, 2004 / Thursday, April 22, 2004 / Friday, April 23, 2004 / Saturday, April 24, 2004 / Sunday, April 25, 2004 / Monday, April 26, 2004 / Tuesday, April 27, 2004 / Thursday, April 29, 2004 / Friday, April 30, 2004 / Saturday, May 01, 2004 / Sunday, May 02, 2004 / Monday, May 03, 2004 / Tuesday, May 04, 2004 / Wednesday, May 05, 2004 / Thursday, May 06, 2004 / Friday, May 07, 2004 / Saturday, May 08, 2004 / Sunday, May 09, 2004 / Monday, May 10, 2004 / Tuesday, May 11, 2004 / Wednesday, May 12, 2004 / Friday, May 14, 2004 / Saturday, May 15, 2004 / Sunday, May 16, 2004 / Monday, May 17, 2004 / Tuesday, May 18, 2004 / Wednesday, May 19, 2004 / Wednesday, May 26, 2004 / Thursday, May 27, 2004 / Friday, May 28, 2004 / Saturday, May 29, 2004 / Sunday, May 30, 2004 / Monday, May 31, 2004 / Thursday, June 03, 2004 / Friday, June 04, 2004 / Saturday, June 05, 2004 / Sunday, June 06, 2004 / Tuesday, June 08, 2004 / Wednesday, June 09, 2004 / Thursday, June 10, 2004 / Friday, June 11, 2004 / Saturday, June 12, 2004 / Sunday, June 13, 2004 / Monday, June 14, 2004 / Tuesday, June 15, 2004 / Thursday, June 17, 2004 / Friday, June 18, 2004 / Saturday, June 19, 2004 / Sunday, June 20, 2004 / Monday, June 21, 2004 / Tuesday, June 22, 2004 / Wednesday, June 23, 2004 / Thursday, June 24, 2004 / Friday, June 25, 2004 / Saturday, June 26, 2004 / Sunday, June 27, 2004 / Monday, June 28, 2004 / Tuesday, June 29, 2004 / Wednesday, June 30, 2004 / Thursday, July 01, 2004 / Saturday, July 03, 2004 / Sunday, July 04, 2004 / Tuesday, July 06, 2004 / Wednesday, July 07, 2004 / Monday, July 12, 2004 / Tuesday, July 13, 2004 / Wednesday, July 14, 2004 / Monday, July 19, 2004 / Tuesday, July 20, 2004 / Wednesday, July 21, 2004 / Thursday, July 22, 2004 / Friday, July 23, 2004 / Saturday, July 24, 2004 / Sunday, July 25, 2004 / Monday, July 26, 2004 / Tuesday, July 27, 2004 / Wednesday, July 28, 2004 / Thursday, July 29, 2004 / Sunday, August 01, 2004 / Monday, August 02, 2004 / Wednesday, August 04, 2004 / Thursday, August 05, 2004 / Friday, August 06, 2004 / Saturday, August 07, 2004 / Sunday, August 08, 2004 / Monday, August 09, 2004 / Tuesday, August 10, 2004 / Friday, August 13, 2004 / Sunday, August 15, 2004 / Friday, September 17, 2004 / Sunday, September 19, 2004 / Tuesday, September 21, 2004 / Wednesday, September 22, 2004 / Thursday, September 23, 2004 / Sunday, September 26, 2004 / Monday, September 27, 2004 / Wednesday, September 29, 2004 / Thursday, September 30, 2004 / Friday, October 01, 2004 / Monday, October 04, 2004 / Tuesday, October 05, 2004 / Wednesday, October 06, 2004 / Thursday, October 07, 2004 / Saturday, October 09, 2004 / Sunday, October 10, 2004 / Tuesday, October 12, 2004 / Thursday, October 14, 2004 / Friday, October 15, 2004 / Saturday, October 16, 2004 / Sunday, October 17, 2004 / Monday, October 18, 2004 / Tuesday, October 19, 2004 / Wednesday, October 20, 2004 / Thursday, October 21, 2004 / Thursday, October 28, 2004 / Saturday, October 30, 2004 / Tuesday, November 02, 2004 / Friday, November 05, 2004 / Saturday, November 06, 2004 / Monday, November 08, 2004 / Tuesday, November 09, 2004 / Wednesday, November 10, 2004 / Friday, November 12, 2004 / Monday, November 15, 2004 / Tuesday, November 16, 2004 / Wednesday, November 17, 2004 / Monday, November 22, 2004 / Tuesday, November 23, 2004 / Friday, November 26, 2004 / Monday, November 29, 2004 / Tuesday, December 07, 2004 / Thursday, December 09, 2004 / Friday, December 10, 2004 / Sunday, December 12, 2004 / Monday, December 13, 2004 / Tuesday, December 14, 2004 / Thursday, December 16, 2004 / Friday, December 17, 2004 / Tuesday, December 21, 2004 / Sunday, December 26, 2004 / Monday, December 27, 2004 / Monday, January 03, 2005 / Tuesday, January 04, 2005 / Thursday, January 06, 2005 / Friday, January 07, 2005 / Saturday, January 08, 2005 / Sunday, January 09, 2005 / Monday, January 24, 2005 / Wednesday, January 26, 2005 / Monday, January 31, 2005 / Tuesday, February 01, 2005 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Friday, March 25, 2005 /


Powered by Blogger